“A group of researchers says it has identified a hidden reason we use Google for nearly all web searches,” reports the Washington Post. “We’ve never given other options a real shot.”
Their research experiment suggests that Google is overwhelmingly popular partly because we believe it’s the best, whether that’s true or not. It’s like a preference for your favorite soda. And their research suggested that our mass devotion to googling can be altered with habit-changing techniques, including by bribing people to try search alternatives to see what they are like…
“I realized Bing was not as bad as I thought it was….” one study participant said — which an assistant professor in business economics and public policy at the University of Pennsylvania says is a nice summation of the study’s findings.
“The researchers did not test other search engines,” the article notes. But it also points out that more importantly: the research caught the attention of some government officials:
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser (D), who is leading the group of states that sued Google alongside the Justice Department, said the research helped inspire a demand by the states to fix Google’s search monopoly. They asked a judge to require Google to bankroll a consumer information campaign about web search alternatives, including “short-term incentive payments.”
On the basis of that, the article suggests “you could soon be paid to try Microsoft Bing or another alternative.”
And in the meantime, the reporter writes, “I encourage you to join me in a two-week (unpaid) experiment mirroring the research: Change your standard search engine to something other than Google and see whether you like it. (And drop me a line to let me know how it went.) I’m going with DuckDuckGo, a privacy-focused web search engine that uses Bing’s technology.”